|
Posted By FTRF Staff,
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Updated: Friday, July 27, 2012
|
We learned with sadness of the death of pioneering science fiction and
fantasy writer Ray Bradbury.
Bradbury will perhaps best be remembered for his dystopian novel Fahrenheit 451, which, nearly 60 years
after its publication, remains one of the most important works of art about
censorship—and a target of would-be censors.
Some of the challenges to Bradbury’s work, as recorded
by the ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF) and published in ALA’s Banned Books Resource Guide by Robert P.
Doyle:
Fahrenheit 451: Expurgated at the Venado Middle School in Irvine. Students received copies of the book
with scores of words—mostly "hells” and "damns”—blacked out. After receiving complaints from parents
and being contacted by reporters, school officials said the censored copies
would no longer be used. (CA 1992)
Challenged at the Conroe Independent School District because
of the following: "discussion of being drunk, smoking cigarettes, violence,
‘dirty talk,’ references to the Bible, and using God’s name in vain.” The novel
went against the complaintants’ "religious beliefs.” (TX 2006)
The Martian Chronicles: Challenged at the Haines City High School due to
several instances of profanity and the use of God’s name in vain in the work.
(FL 1982)
Pulled and replaced with a newer version at the
Herbert Hoover Middle School in Edison because a chapter contains the words
"the niggers are coming.” The new
abridged edition of the book omits the inflammatory story, titled "Way Up in
the Air.” (NJ 1998)
The Veldt:
Retained on the Beaverton School District’s reading list. The short story was challenged by a
middle-school parent who thought its language and plot were inappropriate for
students. Her biggest concern is
that the story offers no consequences for the children’s actions. The short story is part of Bradbury’s The Illustrated Man anthology. It is twenty pages long and was
published in 1951 as the first in the collection of eighteen science fiction
stories.
OIF also has received notification of multiple challenges
to Bradbury’s story "The Sound of Thunder.”
Fahrenheit
451 is the second selection of the
FAIFE Book Club, co-sponsored by OIF and IFLA’s Committee on Freedom of Access
to Information and Freedom of Expression. This international, online initiative
will feature resources and events on the book through summer 2012. For more
information, visit faifebookclub.ala.org.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By FTRF Staff,
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Updated: Friday, July 27, 2012
|
On May 8, brilliant author and illustrator Maurice Sendak died. Sendak wrote In the Night Kitchen, one of the most frequently challenged books
of the past 30 years due to a drawing featuring a nude boy. (It also has been defaced many times by
librarians and others who drew shorts or diapers on Mikey, the book’s protagonist.) His Some
Swell Pup was challenged at the Multnomah, OR, County Library because in it
a dog urinates on people, and children abuse animals. A side note: Sendak’s inimitable Where
the Wild Things Are was a key part of one of FTRF’s more interesting cases
of the past decade. Not because of a censorship challenge, however ... well,
not an actual censorship
challenge.
In November
2003, FTRF partnered with the Association of American Publishers and thirteen
other groups in submitting an amicus
brief to the Texas Supreme Court in support of a newspaper’s right to engage in
political satire as a means of commenting on government officials’
actions. In the case, a judge and district attorney claimed they were
libeled by the Dallas Observer, after the paper (an alternative weekly)
published a fictitious article criticizing the officials’ role in jailing a
13-year-old boy for writing a school-assigned essay for Halloween, which
discussed the shooting of a teacher and two students. The article
recounted the jailing of a six-year-old girl for "suspicion of making a
terrorist threat” in a book report on Sendak’s Where the Wild Things Are.
On September 3,
2005, the Texas Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the Observer,
saying the article was satire and protected by the First Amendment, and thus
the officials could not sue for libel.
The case was New Times, Inc. v.
Isaacks.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By FTRF Staff,
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Updated: Friday, July 27, 2012
|
In
the April election, five trustees were elected to two-year terms on the Freedom
to Read Foundation Board:
Carol Brey-Casiano (Brasilia, Brazil) is an
information resource officer at theU.S.Embassy in Brazil and is a
past president of the American Library Association.
Julius C. Jefferson, Jr. (Washington, D.C.) is an
information research specialist at the Library of Congress.
Mary Minow (Cupertino, Calif.) is a
library law consultant and is Follett Chair at Dominican University's Graduate
School of Library and Information Science.
Judith Platt (Washington, D.C.) is the
director of free expression advocacy at the Association of American Publishers.
Nancy P. Zimmerman (Columbia, S.C.) is associate
dean for academic affairs at The Graduate School, University of South Carolina.
Brey-Casiano,
Minow, and Platt were re-elected.
Jefferson and Zimmerman were newly elected (Jefferson served previously
on the board as an ex-officio member due to his status as chair of ALA’s
Intellectual Freedom Committee).
The
newly elected trustees joined the following members to form the FTRF Board for
2012–2013:
Helen Adams
Jonathan Bloom
Chris Finan
Christine Jenkins
Herbert Krug
Candace Morgan
Ex-Officio
members of the 2012–2013 FTRF Board:
Maureen Sullivan, ALA President
Pat Scales, ALA IFC Chair, 2011–2012
Keith Michael Fiels, ALA Executive Director
Barbara Stripling, ALA President-Elect
Barbara
M. Jones is the FTRF secretary and executive director. The officers for 2012–2013 will be
selected at the FTRF Annual Meeting in Anaheim, CA on June 21.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By Kent Oliver, FTRF President,
Friday, March 16, 2012
Updated: Friday, July 27, 2012
|
At the Freedom to Read Foundation’s Midwinter Meeting in January, the Board of Trustees approved a strategic plan to help us map out our strategies for the coming years. We have reprinted the bulk of the plan on pages 4–5 of this issue of Freedom to Read Foundation News. The entire plan, including background and details of our "SWOT” analysis, can be found at www.ftrf.org. The strategic plan addresses five critical action areas: awareness, litigation, education, engagement, and capacity building. Specific objectives include strategies to increase FTRF’s membership both within and beyond the library world; to develop a more proactive legal strategy that will see FTRF taking the lead as the plaintiff in critical lawsuits intended to protect and preserve First Amendment rights; to expand FTRF’s educational mission; and to identify and mentor the next generation of intellectual freedom leaders. We have already begun the process of implementing the plan, with work underway toward a new and improved website, better membership materials, and educational programs for attorneys, librarians, and library students. My thanks to ALA Executive Director Keith Michael Fiels (who serves on the FTRF Board in an ex-officio capacity), Executive Director Barbara Jones, and the rest of the Board from the past two years for their hard work in producing what I feel is a vital road map for this truly irreplaceable organization.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By FTRF Staff,
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Updated: Friday, July 27, 2012
|
On February 22, the U.S. Supreme Court held a hearing on the constitutionality of the Stolen Valor Act of 2005, which makes it a federal crime to falsely represent oneself to have been awarded a military medal or ribbon. The Freedom to Read Foundation filed an amicus curiae brief in this case, asking the Court to overturn the Act on the grounds that the law creates a new category of unprotected speech that is contrary to long-standing legal precedents holding that the First Amendment protects non-fraudulent, non-defamatory false speech. Xavier Alvarez was indicted in 2007 after he falsely told an audience, among several other lies, that he had been awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. Alvarez pleaded guilty on the condition that he be allowed to appeal on First Amendment grounds. In August 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed Alvarez’s conviction and found the Stolen Valor Act unconstitutional in a 2–1 decision. (Notably, in U.S. v. Hinkston, a similar case in Colorado, the Tenth Circuit in 2011 upheld the Stolen Valor Act in a 2–1 ruling.) FTRF’s amicus brief, filed with other members of the Media Coalition, argues that, unlike in cases of defamation and fraud, there is no exception to the First Amendment for a government-imposed "test of truth,” and that enforcement of such a test would chill the speech of law-abiding media and other entities that distribute information. Exaggerations or even mistakes are not exempted from the Stolen Valor Act. Other organizations filing briefs in support of Mr. Alvarez include the ACLU, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, and the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression. Those filing amicus briefs in support of the government include the American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars, and attorneys general of 20 states. All the briefs in the case, along with the transcript of the oral argument, can be found at www.mediacoalition.org.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|